Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Amazing, the obvious. Now I get this:
Hmm, I didn't get any more trouble after I fixed the pragma problem.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
> fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
Yes, and if you'd been reading the mailing list like you're supposed
to you would have already known about this.
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
>>
>>>gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
>>>#pragma weak foo = bar
>>
>>What's the correct way to do this now?
>
>
> #pragma weak foo = "bar"
>
> as you'd h
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> > gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> > #pragma weak foo = bar
> What's the correct way to do this now?
#pragma weak foo = "bar"
as you'd have guessed if you'd bothered to read the error message
> > > #pragma weak foo = bar
> >
> > What's the correct way to do this now?
>
> I dont know. :-( There are hacks that can work around it, but I think this
> is unintentional breakage. I tried changing this:
> #pragma weak foo = bar
> to
> __weak_reference(bar, foo);
void f () __attribute__ ((
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
> >
> > gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> > #pr
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> >
> > FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
>
> gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> #pragma weak foo = bar
What's the correct
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
>
> FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
#pragma weak foo = bar
> Wilko
>
> > I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
>
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
Wilko
> I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
> fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
>
> installing in lib/XThrStub...
> rm
I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
installing in lib/XThrStub...
rm -f UIThrStubs.o
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../exports/lib cc -c -O -pipe-ansi -pedantic
-Dasm=__asm
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -I../.. -I../../exports/
10 matches
Mail list logo