> NOTE that unlike the WIDE client, the ISC client defaults to overwriting
> your /etc/resolv.conf file. In my case, an action that pisses me off
> because I now have to write a messy /etc/dhclient.conf file to stop this
> nonsence.
On the flip side, you'll be able to set things the way you want
OK, I've decided to import the ISC client. I am not pleased with this
choice, but I believe the FreeBSD community in general seems to prefer
this choice.
Swaying arguments:
1. OpenBSD uses the ISC client and keep a careful eye on it for software
engineering issues. (which is really all that buf
> May I suggest looking at the OpenBSD dhcp client/server? I'm not sure
> which one they're derived from, but the CHANGES file lists a bunch of
> bug and security fixes.
It looks like they're using the ISC dhcp client (and server).
Dan Eischen
eisc...@vigrid.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to m
May I suggest looking at the OpenBSD dhcp client/server? I'm not sure
which one they're derived from, but the CHANGES file lists a bunch of
bug and security fixes.
-- Parag Patel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
> Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> > I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client is
> > being made on the basis that David has commit privledges and I do
> > not.
>
> It's not. It's being made on the basis that David took the initiative
> and
s anyone have a good feel for which dhcp client would be better
from a security standpoint? (me, I don't have a clue, but maybe
that's something to consider)
I'd also note that I have no particular preference which DHCP
client is used, but I do very much like the idea that some D
In article
, Richard
Wackerbarth wrote:
> I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client is
> being made on the basis that David has commit privledges and I do
> not.
It's not. It's being made on the basis that David took the initiative
and did the wo
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 09:59:52AM -0600, Charlie ROOT wrote:
> If someone will agree to commit the files, I'd be happy to supply
> the pieces for the ISC DHCP2 client to drop in.
I already have a bmaked ISC v2 dhclient. I bmaked both so I would more
informated about how easy either would be to a
I do not dispute that he "likes" the WIDE client. However, his
choice seems to be based on familarity rather than CURRENT technical
evaluation.
I have (recently) tried both clients.
For the simple case, both work satisfactorily.
The ISC client/server (pl10) builds right out of the box.
I prefer
> I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client
> is being made on the basis that David has commit privledges
> and I do not. Further, it is clear that David has not used a
> recent release of the isc client and is biasing his opinion
> with false assertions.
H.
Jordan,
I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client
is being made on the basis that David has commit privledges
and I do not. Further, it is clear that David has not used a
recent release of the isc client and is biasing his opinion
with false assertions.
It is my opinion that
11 matches
Mail list logo