Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-06-03 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 9:03 AM FreeBSD User wrote: > Am Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 > Warner Losh schrieb: > > Sorry for the late response. > > > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 2:59 AM FreeBSD User > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > on CURRENT, enabling in /etc/src.conf > > > > > > WITH_BEARS

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-06-03 Thread FreeBSD User
Am Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 Warner Losh schrieb: Sorry for the late response. > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 2:59 AM FreeBSD User wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > on CURRENT, enabling in /etc/src.conf > > > > WITH_BEARSSL= > > > > seems to result in a slightly enlarged loader binary, which seems

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-06-01 Thread Toomas Soome
> On 1. Jun 2023, at 11:30, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Wed, 31 May 2023 14:41:23 -0600 > Warner Losh mailto:i...@bsdimp.com>> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:30?PM Gary Jennejohn wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 >>> Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>> [SNIP irrelevant text]

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-06-01 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 31 May 2023 14:41:23 -0600 Warner Losh wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:30?PM Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > > [SNIP irrelevant text] > > > > > And no, I really do not want to support 'loadable modules'. BIOS booting > > is

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-05-31 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:30 PM Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 > Warner Losh wrote: > > [SNIP irrelevant text] > > > And no, I really do not want to support 'loadable modules'. BIOS booting > is > > on the way out, and people > > that want to do complex stuff in the b

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-05-31 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
> the loader program. You may also have to disable the lua build, since it uses > more stack and is just a smidge > larger than the forth build. _simp will be the smallest of them > all. On my system, without bearssl, I see: Back when I first did the LOADER_VERIEXEC bits, I found lua pushed thing

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-05-31 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:15:12 -0600 Warner Losh wrote: [SNIP irrelevant text] > And no, I really do not want to support 'loadable modules'. BIOS booting is > on the way out, and people > that want to do complex stuff in the boot loader will simply have to do > that in UEFI or maybe kboot/LinuxBoo

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-05-31 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 2:59 AM FreeBSD User wrote: > Hello, > > on CURRENT, enabling in /etc/src.conf > > WITH_BEARSSL= > > seems to result in a slightly enlarged loader binary, which seems to have > a fixed size > supposed on the error I get. See below. > > The system is amd64 (64 bit), for the

Re: WITH_BEARSSL: -8112 bytes available

2023-05-29 Thread Gordon Bergling
Hi, On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:58:27AM +0200, FreeBSD User wrote: > on CURRENT, enabling in /etc/src.conf > > WITH_BEARSSL= > > seems to result in a slightly enlarged loader binary, which seems to have a > fixed size > supposed on the error I get. See below. > > The system is amd64 (64 bit), f