On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:52:15 -0600
Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021, 12:37 PM Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
[snip patch]
> > > > Since pf.h is used so widely in the tree it's probably the simplest
> > fix.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I like this. I'd unconditionally remove the test in preferen
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021, 12:37 PM Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:58:50 -0600
> Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021, 10:02 AM Gary Jennejohn
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This simple patch to /usr/src/include/Makefile fixes it for me:
> > >
> > > --- Makefile.orig 2021-12
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:58:50 -0600
Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021, 10:02 AM Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> >
> > This simple patch to /usr/src/include/Makefile fixes it for me:
> >
> > --- Makefile.orig 2021-12-22 13:37:02.817745000 +0100
> > +++ Makefile2021-12-22 13:37:12.1773
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021, 10:02 AM Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:51:54 +0100
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:27:52 +0100
> Kristof Provost wrote:
>
> > On 22 Dec 2021, at 8:21, Konrad Sewi??o-Jopek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think the reason is somewhere in t
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:51:54 +0100
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:27:52 +0100
Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2021, at 8:21, Konrad Sewi??o-Jopek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the reason is somewhere in tools/build/test-includes:
> >
> > --- net/if_pfsync.o ---
> > In file i
On 22 Dec 2021, at 8:21, Konrad Sewiłło-Jopek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the reason is somewhere in tools/build/test-includes:
>
> --- net/if_pfsync.o ---
> In file included from net/if_pfsync.c:1:
> In file included from
> [...]freebsd/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/net/if_pfsync.h:56:
> [...]freebsd
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:04:01 +0100
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:21:35 +0100
> Konrad Sewi??o-Jopek wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the reason is somewhere in tools/build/test-includes:
> >
> > --- net/if_pfsync.o ---
> > In file included from net/if_pfsync.c:1:
> > In file
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:21:35 +0100
Konrad Sewi??o-Jopek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the reason is somewhere in tools/build/test-includes:
>
> --- net/if_pfsync.o ---
> In file included from net/if_pfsync.c:1:
> In file included from
> [...]freebsd/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/net/if_pfsync.h:56:
Hi,
I think the reason is somewhere in tools/build/test-includes:
--- net/if_pfsync.o ---
In file included from net/if_pfsync.c:1:
In file included from
[...]freebsd/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/net/if_pfsync.h:56:
[...]freebsd/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/net/pfvar.h:65:10: fatal error:
'netpf
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:05:35 +0800
Alastair Hogge wrote:
> On Sunday, 19 December 2021 6:47:23 PM AWST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > Some recent change, probably in a .mk file, breaks builworld on HEAD
> > when WITHOUT_PF is enabled in src.conf.
>
> I have had to disable WITHOUT_PF since 2020-07-2
On Sunday, 19 December 2021 6:47:23 PM AWST Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Some recent change, probably in a .mk file, breaks builworld on HEAD
> when WITHOUT_PF is enabled in src.conf.
I have had to disable WITHOUT_PF since 2020-07-27, but probably earlier.
> Disabling WITHOUT_PF results in a successfu
Some recent change, probably in a .mk file, breaks builworld on HEAD
when WITHOUT_PF is enabled in src.conf.
Disabling WITHOUT_PF results in a successful buildworld.
The reported error is that netpfil/pf/pf.h can't be found.
--
Gary Jennejohn
12 matches
Mail list logo
