On Friday, 14 March 2003 at 10:05:28 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:16:02PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> So I did. Loaned two SCSI disks and 50-pin cable. Things haven't
>>> improved a bit, I'm very sorry to say it.
>>
>> Sorry for the slo
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:16:02PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I did. Loaned two SCSI disks and 50-pin cable. Things haven't
> > improved a bit, I'm very sorry to say it.
>
> Sorry for the slow reply to this. I thought it would make sense to
> try things out here
On Saturday, 1 March 2003 at 20:43:10 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>
The vinum R5 and system as a whole were stable without
softupdates. Only one problem remained after disabling softupdates,
while being online and u
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > > The vinum R5 and system as a whole were stable without
> > > softupdates. Only one problem remained after disabling softupdates,
> > > while being online and user I/O going on, rebuilding of failed disk
> > > corrupt the R5 vol
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:59:59AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The crashes and anomalies with filesystem residing on R5 volume were
> > related to vinum(R5)/softupdates combo.
>
> Well, at one point we suspected that. But the cases I have seen were
> based on a misa
On Friday, 21 February 2003 at 1:56:56 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>> The crashes and anomalies with filesystem residing on R5 volume were
>> related to vinum(R5)/softupdates combo. The vinum R5 and system as
>> a whole were stable without softupdates. Only one problem rema
On Friday, 21 February 2003 at 10:00:46 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:28:45PM -0800, Darryl Okahata
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll second Brad's statement about vinum and softupdates
>>> interactions. My last exper
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think this is an expected problem with a lot of concatenation,
> > whether through Vinum, GEOM, RAIDFrame, or whatever.
> >
> > This comes about for the same reason that you can't "mount -u"
> > to turn Soft Updates from "off" t
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is an expected problem with a lot of concatenation,
> whether through Vinum, GEOM, RAIDFrame, or whatever.
>
> This comes about for the same reason that you can't "mount -u"
> to turn Soft Updates from "off" to "on": Soft Updates does not
>
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> The crashes and anomalies with filesystem residing on R5 volume were
> related to vinum(R5)/softupdates combo. The vinum R5 and system as
> a whole were stable without softupdates. Only one problem remained
> after disabling softupdates, while being online and user I/O going
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:28:45PM -0800, Darryl Okahata
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll second Brad's statement about vinum and softupdates
> > interactions. My last experiments with vinum were more than half a
> > year ago, but I guess it still
11 matches
Mail list logo
