Re: VIA Appolo IDE controller handling in new ata driver

1999-07-21 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Bruce Evans wrote: > >Currently VIA Apollo IDE controller in the new ata driver handled as > >"Generic UDMA" controller, but AFAIK this controller was designed to be > >fully compatible with the Intel PIIX4 chip. To test if I'm right I made > > No, they are quite different. See the old driver fo

Re: VIA Appolo IDE controller handling in new ata driver

1999-07-21 Thread Bruce Evans
>Currently VIA Apollo IDE controller in the new ata driver handled as >"Generic UDMA" controller, but AFAIK this controller was designed to be >fully compatible with the Intel PIIX4 chip. To test if I'm right I made No, they are quite different. See the old driver for 500 lines of differences.

VIA Appolo IDE controller handling in new ata driver

1999-07-21 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Currently VIA Apollo IDE controller in the new ata driver handled as "Generic UDMA" controller, but AFAIK this controller was designed to be fully compatible with the Intel PIIX4 chip. To test if I'm right I made a minor change in dma initialisation code to initialise it exactly as PIIX4 controlle