Re: Traditional cpp (was: /usr/bin/calendar broken on current)

2012-11-13 Thread David O'Brien
Days people did things like that. So, it seems, does imake, and I'm > sure others will come out of the woodwork. ... > > Clang will most likely never support traditional preprocessing. ... > What we really need is a traditional cpp. That's not difficult: > there&#x

Re: Traditional cpp

2012-11-12 Thread Niclas Zeising
e others will come out of the woodwork. >> >>> Clang will most likely never support traditional preprocessing. >> >> OK. >> >>> It is probably better to just use sed or awk for this kind of >>> trickery. >> >> I'm not sure that's the

Re: Traditional cpp

2012-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
kely never support traditional preprocessing. OK. It is probably better to just use sed or awk for this kind of trickery. I'm not sure that's the way to go. It's more work than it's worth. What we really need is a traditional cpp. That's not difficult: there's one in 4.3B

Traditional cpp (was: /usr/bin/calendar broken on current)

2012-11-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
out of the woodwork. > Clang will most likely never support traditional preprocessing. OK. > It is probably better to just use sed or awk for this kind of > trickery. I'm not sure that's the way to go. It's more work than it's worth. What we really need is a