Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.

2000-04-24 Thread Mike Nowlin
> personalities or styles. In this case, I'd say it was a job for the > CRC if we currently had one. :) Does that make it a "CRC Check"? :) (Good old redundant-terminology Cyclical-Reduncancy-Check Checks.) mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freeb

Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.

2000-04-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :>Really, then you have a short memory. Why don't we ask Jordan for a :>clarification. : :How about if you let me review the patches in question and I'll render :a decision. : :If you, Matt, could put the SMP and linux stuff into -current first :and then give me a day or so to check i

Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.

2000-04-23 Thread Mike Muir
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > >Really, then you have a short memory. Why don't we ask Jordan for a > >clarification. > > How about if you let me review the patches in question and I'll render > a decision. > > If you, Matt, could put the SMP and linux stuff into -current first > and t

Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.

2000-04-23 Thread Mike Muir
Good greif that last one failed to go to stable@ or current@.. time to fix mail. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.

2000-04-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
>Really, then you have a short memory. Why don't we ask Jordan for a >clarification. How about if you let me review the patches in question and I'll render a decision. If you, Matt, could put the SMP and linux stuff into -current first and then give me a day or so to check it out, I'll