On 2015-10-13 01:32, White Knight wrote:
On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it
to > 64k.
Please do submit diffs for revie.w :)
I'll work on the patch this week, thank you.
I have submitted a bug report, with a patch fo
On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to
> 64k.
Please do submit diffs for revie.w :)
I'll work on the patch this week, thank you.
--
White Knight
I'm not from 2ch.net, I just work there.
__
I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k.
Please do submit diffs for revie.w :)
-a
On 9 October 2015 at 00:23, White Knight wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2012, raising the limit of kern.ipc.somaxcann was discussed (now
> properly called kern.ipc.acceptqueue) bu
Hi,
Back in 2012, raising the limit of kern.ipc.somaxcann was discussed (now
properly called kern.ipc.acceptqueue) but nothing came of it. The old
discussion is here:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030970.html
We are running into problems with the limit
