Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199901300636.raa20...@atdot.dotat.org> Mark Newton writes:
> : It's early days yet, folks -- You'll probably have trouble getting 100%
> : functionality out of most things (specifically, poll() on a socket doesn't
> : look like it works at the moment, so Netsca
In message <199901300636.raa20...@atdot.dotat.org> Mark Newton writes:
: It's early days yet, folks -- You'll probably have trouble getting 100%
: functionality out of most things (specifically, poll() on a socket doesn't
: look like it works at the moment, so Netscape doesn't work (among other
: t
I've just committed the FreeBSD svr4 emulator, which has been built
by adapting the stirling work of Christos Zoulas from the NetBSD project
to FreeBSD.
I hope I haven't left anything out or broken the world, but I'm sure
I'll hear about it if I have :-)
To use it:
1. Add "pseudo-device strea
Mark Newton wrote:
> Ok, people, heads up -- I'm about to commit a patch to /sys/i386
> which changes the way FreeBSD uses the x86 LDT. Specifically,
> I'm moving LUDATA_SEL from LDT entry 4 to 5 (Why 5? Why not?)
> and re-using entry 4 as a call gate for SysV system calls made
> by library stubs
Ok, people, heads up -- I'm about to commit a patch to /sys/i386
which changes the way FreeBSD uses the x86 LDT. Specifically,
I'm moving LUDATA_SEL from LDT entry 4 to 5 (Why 5? Why not?)
and re-using entry 4 as a call gate for SysV system calls made
by library stubs from Solaris 2.6 and higher.
