On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
> > shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
> > space
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
> shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
> space consumed.
> By default, stack for the amd64 thread is 4MB, that should b
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> tzload() allocates ~80KB for the local variables. The backtrace you provided
> shows the nested call to tzload(), so there is total 160KB of the stack
> space consumed.
Isn't it a little bit hungry? To do this on stack? Softwa
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
> >
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:59:53 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
> > another one running 9.0-BETA2.
> >
> > I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
> > another one running 9.0-BETA2.
> >
> > I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
> another one running 9.0-BETA2.
>
> I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has run flawlessly so far. I
> compiled manually this very version on 9
Hi list,
I've recently migrated my services from a box running 8.1-STABLE to
another one running 9.0-BETA2.
I run stunnel 4.28 on 8.1-STABLE, and it has run flawlessly so far. I
compiled manually this very version on 9.0-BETA2. But I get the
following segfault:
Program received signal SIGS
