On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 06:40:58PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
> Yes, I have. It doesn't make much of a dent in the real problem, which
> is separating diffs like:
Good point.
I adopted the rc.local solution some time ago, which simplified matters
a lot for me. As yet, I've not been caug
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 10:11:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
> > I haven't used it yet, but I definately think the idea is an
> > improvement. I hate trying to update /etc after an upgrade.. if it's
> > been a while, or it's
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Christopher Masto wrote:
> I haven't used it yet, but I definately think the idea is an
> improvement. I hate trying to update /etc after an upgrade.. if it's
> been a while, or it's between major versions, it can take a very
> significant amount of time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Masto [mailto:ch...@netmonger.net]
> Sent: 07 February 1999 20:14
> To: curr...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: was: some woes about rc.conf.site
>
>
> I haven't used it yet, but I definately think the idea is an
> impro
I haven't used it yet, but I definately think the idea is an
improvement. I hate trying to update /etc after an upgrade.. if it's
been a while, or it's between major versions, it can take a very
significant amount of time. Anything that moves local changes to a
seperate file is a blessing.
Also,
