Re: trek73

1999-10-26 Thread Ben Rosengart
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Jim Bryant wrote: > No matter what Lush Rimbaugh says on the topic, frivilous lawsuits > RARELY win in court. A lawsuit over this would indeed be frivilous. You don't have to win in court, you merely have to exhaust the resources of your opponent. Walnut Creek doesn't have

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Jim Bryant
In reply: > On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > "unauthorized" things for keeping Trek alive in the first place... If > > > > it came out that Paramount ever tried litigation over such things, > > > > they would lose a LOT of fans, and the money in their pockets! What > > > > w

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Ben Rosengart
You're talking as if litigious corporations follow logic and common sense. This is more the exception than the rule IMO. Don't construe this as arguing against the inclusion of trek73 ... I think you're probably right that the risk is minimal, but for different reasons. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Jim Bryant
In reply: > > On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Jim Bryant wrote: > > > > > "unauthorized" things for keeping Trek alive in the first place... If > > > it came out that Paramount ever tried litigation over such things, > > > they would lose a LOT of fans, and the money in their pockets! What > > > would come

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Jim Bryant wrote: > "unauthorized" things for keeping Trek alive in the first place... If > it came out that Paramount ever tried litigation over such things, > they would lose a LOT of fans, and the money in their pockets! What > would come next? Sueing people at conventi

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Jim Bryant
In reply: > On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > >

Re: trek73

1999-10-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > of people including

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Darryl Okahata
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm... it looks like the one I have is older. It looks like Jeff had > made a huge number of enhancements between 1985 and 1988! Pretty cool, > actually, though neither game is multi-player. Well, for multi-player, we had the most fu

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
:we used to play a startrek [multi-user] at buena high school in :ventura on the PDP-11/44 and was written in BASIC-Plus 2 under RSTS/E :in 1984. It could have been a port of the same game... i've been :looking for that one for years. i lost my only listing of that in one :of my moves to texas

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : :> I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This :> is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten :> by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch :> of people inclu

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I don't want to get nasty here, but was it _really_ necessary to forward > the entire, original, humungous mail to add a few lines of commentary to Sorry, but as I already commented to another person, I actually only read the first two paragraphs of Matt's message before replying and didn't eve

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Gary Jennejohn
"Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> I don't think any of the authors would mind if it went into /usr/games, > >I certainly wouldn't. It would be an old game returning home to the >Berkeley world, and I also used to play it a lot on the HP-2000. > >The 'ol HP 2000 access, now that brings back memor

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Darryl Okahata
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > of people including m

Re: trek73

1999-10-24 Thread Jim Bryant
In reply: > On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > >

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Did anyone bother to look at /usr/src/games/trek/main.c: trek != trek73. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> > No. Make it a port. Policy, remember? 8) > > I guess the anti-bloatists would have a point on this one... > > I would not object to a port. It certainly eliminates the > bike shed arguments over it. Did anyone bother to look at /usr/src/games/trek/main.c: ** C version by Eric P. All

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> No. Make it a port. Policy, remember? 8) I guess the anti-bloatists would have a point on this one... I would not object to a port. It certainly eliminates the bike shed arguments over it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the b

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Mike Smith
> > I guess the real question is: /usr/games or /usr/ports? I don't care > > which, but I would personally prefer /usr/games because it really is > > an old-time berkeley program. > > Perhaps we should ask Kirk... ;) No. Make it a port. Policy, remember? 8) -- \\ Give a man a f

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Chuck Robey
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > of people including

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I guess the real question is: /usr/games or /usr/ports? I don't care > which, but I would personally prefer /usr/games because it really is > an old-time berkeley program. Perhaps we should ask Kirk... ;) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :> I don't think any of the authors would mind if it went into /usr/games, : :I certainly wouldn't. It would be an old game returning home to the :Berkeley world, and I also used to play it a lot on the HP-2000. : :The 'ol HP 2000 access, now that brings back memories... Did you know :I o

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I don't think any of the authors would mind if it went into /usr/games, I certainly wouldn't. It would be an old game returning home to the Berkeley world, and I also used to play it a lot on the HP-2000. The 'ol HP 2000 access, now that brings back memories... Did you know I once wrote

Re: trek73

1999-10-23 Thread Julian Elischer
a port? On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I found a copy of the C version of trek73 in my Amiga archives. This > is the trek73 originally written in HP-2000 Basic that was rewritten > by Dave Pare and Chris Williams in C and seriously enhanced by a bunch > of people