On 05/09/2020 18:18, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 05/09/2020 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-05 11:00, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 04/09/2020 09:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-04 01:42, Graham Perrin wrote:
This week for the first time I toyed with OpenZFS on a USB device:
a mo
On 12/09/2020 03:09, Graham Perrin wrote:
… If the pool is ONLINE and imported at suspend time – and if not
actively writing to the device at suspend time …
Testing more aggressively (still with a low spec USB flash drive),
attempting to suspend _immediately after_ writes to the file system.
I'm not sure what was going on with device numbers in my previous
report, but this much seems to be easily and consistently reproducible.
If the pool is ONLINE and imported at suspend time – and if not actively
writing to the device at suspend time – then at resume time:
* the pool is SUSPEND
On 05/09/2020 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-05 11:00, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 04/09/2020 09:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-04 01:42, Graham Perrin wrote:
This week for the first time I toyed with OpenZFS on a USB device:
a mobile hard disk drive connected to the dock
On 2020-09-05 11:00, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 04/09/2020 09:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 2020-09-04 01:42, Graham Perrin wrote:
This week for the first time I toyed with OpenZFS on a USB device: a
mobile hard disk drive connected to the dock of an HP EliteBook 8570p.
A light test, with th
On 2020-09-04 01:42, Graham Perrin wrote:
This week for the first time I toyed with OpenZFS on a USB device: a
mobile hard disk drive connected to the dock of an HP EliteBook 8570p.
A light test, with the pool imported but not writing to the dataset at
suspend time.
At resume time (22:31), t
