Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 9 January 2012 21:06, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > So you ar

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I >>> see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > > On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > > > Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature > > > of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has > > > been released ? > > That is exactly

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on > >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Linimon
> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Excellent!  You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, >> sentences that have no qualifying phrases. >> > FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence I am being sarcastic because I am frustrated. I am frustrated because I am having

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I >> see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult >> freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the annou

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >>> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on >>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with >

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with >> checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which a

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Linimon
> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with > checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually > release images per-se ? Excellent! You've

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-08 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wro

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-08 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >>  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] >>

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote: > >> Hello, > >>  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] > > Has 9.0 been released ? 9.0 will, and only will, be released wh

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-08 Thread Eitan Adler
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote: >> Hello, >>  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] > Has 9.0 been released ? I believe nearly all the release work is done and we are just waiting until the isos propagate to the mirrors befo

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-08 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote: > Hello, >  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? I cannot find any announcement, especially on freebsd-announce@, [9.0TODO] has not been updated, there is no ISO image in [0], but there is in [3], dated from Jan 5th 2012 and `o

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-06 Thread Ken Smith
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 07:16 -0700, Peter wrote: > Not for stable/9 [__FreeBSD_version 900500+: Sorry for the delay cleaning that up. It should be fixed as of r229748. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensm...@buffalo.ed

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-06 Thread Peter
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Peter wrote: >> Hello, >>  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources, >> built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default >> pointing at -current: >> >> pkbsdpkg:#uname -a >> FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

2012-01-05 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Peter wrote: > Hello, >  Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources, > built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default > pointing at -current: > > pkbsdpkg:#uname -a > FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r229599: T