Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-12 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 19:05:30 -0400 (EDT) >From: Robert Watson >I'd actually like to see wtmp only use IP addresses, never hostnames. I would prefer to have that be an installation-selectable option, at least. >Spoofed names are fairly easy to arrange; with IP filtering on border >routers,

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-12 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, N wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't use the FreeBSD patched version, as I use the version with the > > KerberosIV patches (unfortunately the FreeBSD port doesn't do that, but I > > don't have time just now to make it do that :-). It seems to put the IP > > address into the wtmp corr

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-12 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Brian Somers wrote: > [.] > > I got sick of seing "invalid hostname" in my wtmps a while ago on my 2.x > > machines. That is an exceptionally useless piece of behavior, if you ask > > me. Sshd writes out IPs and I find that to be much more consistent (and > > useful). >

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-12 Thread Brian Somers
[.] > I got sick of seing "invalid hostname" in my wtmps a while ago on my 2.x > machines. That is an exceptionally useless piece of behavior, if you ask > me. Sshd writes out IPs and I find that to be much more consistent (and > useful). Sshd gets it wrong though. It gets the full hostname

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-12 Thread Rahul Dhesi
Robert Watson writes: > I'd actually like to see wtmp only use IP addresses, never hostnames. > Spoofed names are fairly easy to arrange; with IP filtering on border > routers, spoofed IPs are harder > This of course sticks you with the task of DNS > lookups when viewing wtmp, when you may a

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-11 Thread Brian Somers
> For some years I have been using patched utilities under SunOS to show > full host names in the output from the 'who', 'finger', and 'last' > commands. (Traditional UNIXes truncate host names to about 16 > characters.) > > I have been thinking of patching FreeBSD programs to do the same, but >

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Rahul Dhesi wrote: > For some years I have been using patched utilities under SunOS to show > full host names in the output from the 'who', 'finger', and 'last' > commands. (Traditional UNIXes truncate host names to about 16 > characters.) > > I have been thinking of patchin

Re: showing full host names in output from who/finger/last

1999-04-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:For some years I have been using patched utilities under SunOS to show :full host names in the output from the 'who', 'finger', and 'last' :commands. (Traditional UNIXes truncate host names to about 16 :characters.) : :I have been thinking of patching FreeBSD programs to do the same, but :since