David O'Brien wrote:
> It works in general for 'make world' and is suffient for FreeBSD
> developent -- the purpose of 5-CURRENT. It is also allowing us to find
> bugs that would otherwise go unfixed in Binutils 2.12.0 release. Or
> would you perfer we stick to 2.11.x forever -- BTW that would n
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:46AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Actually, there was a discussion at BSDCon as to whether or
> not to drop the a.out support in order to decrease the patch
> size necessary to make the FSF distributed code do what FreeBSD
That is true for GCC. For contrib/binutils
"Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> > I believe the intent is to ensure that the patches make it
> > back into the FSF distributed code, so that in the future,
> > there is less maintenance required for FreeBSD platforms.
>
> This is all wonderful.
>
> But then it seems to me that the entire new binut
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 07:33:22AM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe this can now be committed?
> >
> > NOT until I have sufficient feedback from the FSF Binuti
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:39:08PM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 13:29, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ma
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 13:29, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe this can now be committed?
> > >
> > > NOT until I have sufficient feedback
"Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe this can now be committed?
> >
> > NOT until I have sufficient feedback from the FSF Binutils developers.
>
> OK, I'm confused. binutil
Michael D. Harnois wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe this can now be committed?
>>>
>>NOT until I have sufficient feedback from the FSF Binutils developers.
>>
>
> OK, I'm confused. bi
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> >
> > Maybe this can now be committed?
>
> NOT until I have sufficient feedback from the FSF Binutils developers.
OK, I'm confused. binutils has been broken for three weeks. We hav
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> I ventured into this brave new world a few days ago and ran into
> this very problem. Alexander's patch (along with a make install in
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils) fixed it, as advertised.
>
> Maybe this can now be committed?
NOT u
Hi -current,
I ventured into this brave new world a few days ago and ran into
this very problem. Alexander's patch (along with a make install in
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils) fixed it, as advertised.
Maybe this can now be committed?
--Stijn
--
Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply.
Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
>> Interesting. Is the DF_TEXTREL flag set in DT_FLAGS instead? Is the
>> library linked w/ -enable-new-dtags? Are the new dtags enabled by
>> default in the new binutils? Someting in elf32.em?
>
> No. DT_FLAGS entry is not created regardless of whether the
> --enable-
> Interesting. Is the DF_TEXTREL flag set in DT_FLAGS instead? Is the
> library linked w/ -enable-new-dtags? Are the new dtags enabled by
> default in the new binutils? Someting in elf32.em?
No. DT_FLAGS entry is not created regardless of whether the
--enable-new-dtags parameter has been passed t
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:22:59PM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
> > This suggests a problem with the runtime-linker (rtld), not binutils.
> Actually, the bug is somewhere in the new binutils code, and I am very
> close to finding where it is exactly. The new liker fails to set
> DT_TEXTREL p
"Alexander N. Kabaev" wrote:
> > This suggests a problem with the runtime-linker (rtld), not binutils.
> Actually, the bug is somewhere in the new binutils code, and I am very
> close to finding where it is exactly. The new liker fails to set
> DT_TEXTREL property in the shared library header even
> This suggests a problem with the runtime-linker (rtld), not binutils.
Actually, the bug is somewhere in the new binutils code, and I am very
close to finding where it is exactly. The new liker fails to set
DT_TEXTREL property in the shared library header even though its relocation
table contain
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> > building programm with -g gives no more information at all, I have tried
> > Linking aginst static library - works.
>
> This suggests a problem with the runtime-linker (rtld), not binutils.
Wor
David O'Brien wrote:
> This is not much of a bug report. Was libpng compiled with new binuils
> or old? Someone that is having problems (which I am not), needs to
> compile things with -g, not strip them, use gdb and provide a REAL bug
> report.
>
In /etc/make.conf I have:
CFLAGS= -O0 -g -pipe
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> It was in chroot created today as:
>
># cd /usr/src
># cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs upd -dP
># make buildworld
># make installworld DESTDIR=/X/chroot
># cd /usr/src/etc && make destri
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:02:51 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> This is not much of a bug report. Was libpng compiled with new binuils
> or old? Someone that is having problems (which I am not), needs to
> compile things with -g, not strip them, use gdb and provide a REAL bug
> report.
I just
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:59:02PM +0300, Andrej Cernov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote:
> >
> > Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup
> >
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> >
> > % cat > trypng.c
> > #include
> >
> > main(in
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote:
>
> Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup
>
> >How-To-Repeat:
>
> % cat > trypng.c
> #include
>
> main(int ac, char ** av)
> {
> printf("Hello World\n");
> }
> ^D
> % gcc -o trypng trypn
22 matches
Mail list logo
