Outback Dingo wrote this message on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 19:01 -0400:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert > wrote:
>
> > According to Ollivier Robert:
> > > You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one.
> >
> > FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 i
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Ollivier Robert:
> > You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one.
>
> FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a
> prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re@ whether t
According to Ollivier Robert:
> You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one.
FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a
prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re@ whether they would consider
this for 9.2. It is very late in the 9.2 relea
Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 21:30 +0200:
> John-Mark Gurney writes:
> > Mike Tancsa writes:
> > > John-Mark Gurney writes:
> > > > My patch would only effect userland applications that use /dev/crypto...
> > > For me its ssh which I think does, no ?
> > It looks
John-Mark Gurney writes:
> Mike Tancsa writes:
> > John-Mark Gurney writes:
> > > My patch would only effect userland applications that use /dev/crypto...
> > For me its ssh which I think does, no ?
> It looks like it uses OpenSSL for it's crypto, not /dev/crypto...
It uses OpenSSL engines, whi
Mike Tancsa wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 14:19 -0400:
> On 8/23/2013 2:05 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >> Speeding up userland AES is very interesting to me for a couple of apps.
> >> If there is a proper way I should test on RELENG_9, please let me know
> >> as I am few boxes that
According to John-Mark Gurney:
pjd did not merge (as he said at the time of commit) r226839 & r226839. Is
there any objection to merge these two (and possibly 247061 as well --
copyright update)?
>
> You repeated r226839 twice. What is the correct second revision?
You are right, I wanted to s
On 8/23/2013 2:05 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>> Speeding up userland AES is very interesting to me for a couple of apps.
>> If there is a proper way I should test on RELENG_9, please let me know
>> as I am few boxes that I would be happy to test/deploy on.
>
> My patch would only effect userland
Mike Tancsa wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:26 -0400:
> On 8/23/2013 11:16 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
> >> I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
> >> AES-XTS algorithm into u
Ollivier Robert wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 17:16 +0200:
> According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
> > I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
> > AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
> >
On 8/23/2013 11:16 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
>> I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
>> AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
>> changes improve the performan
According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
> I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
> AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
> changes improve the performance over 10x in my tests (from ~150MB/sec to
> over
12 matches
Mail list logo
