Re: none (cvs mirrors)

2001-09-07 Thread KSrinivasa Raghavan
>From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: KSrinivasa Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: none (cvs mirrors) >Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:46:15 -0700 > >On Fri, Sep 07,

Re: none (cvs mirrors)

2001-09-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:24:58PM +, KSrinivasa Raghavan wrote: > Hi Kris, > > cvsup servers doesn't seem to work as cvs servers. The anoncvs server > worked yesterday, but today I am seeing other problems. Yes, I was being sarcastic. They're different protocols. > I have been checking ou

Re: none (cvsup2 as cvs server)

2001-09-07 Thread KSrinivasa Raghavan
. >From: Jim Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: none >Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 20:49:39 -0500 > >John Polstra wrote: > >>In article <[EMAIL PROT

Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:49:39PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > >>For some reasons I was unable to checkout sources from cvs server of > >>FreeBSD sources. I have been using anoncvs.FreeBSD.org to fetch the > >>files. > cvsup2.freebsd.org through cvsupn.freebsd.org seem to work just fine... as cv

Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Jim Bryant
John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > KSrinivasa Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>For some reasons I was unable to checkout sources from cvs server of >>FreeBSD sources. I have been using anoncvs.FreeBSD.org to fetch the >>files. >> > > I believe the administrators have

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:03:37PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > The GCC and OpenBSD people depend on anoncvs as their main repo transport > > mechanism. > > (You can't transport a repo with cvs. OpenBSD infrastructure Not in the sense of CVSup, but for some defintion of "transport" yo

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Christian Weisgerber
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - You need a pretty powerful machine to handle even, say, 4-6 clients > > at a time. Anonymous CVS is a hog like you wouldn't believe. > > I have to wonder if there are tricks one can use. No. Get a gig of memory, and put ~anoncvs/tmp on a memory

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Christian Weisgerber
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the right mailing list to plead for more anoncvs mirrors? grappa.unix-ag.uni-kl.de provides anoncvs, among other services. (See http://.../ for a list.) However, - the box runs on OpenBSD, and since all three BSDs appear to use incompatible e

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > - You need a pretty powerful machine to handle even, say, 4-6 clients > at a time. Anonymous CVS is a hog like you wouldn't believe. > Don't try to use the machine for anything else if you're using it > for anonymous CVS. I ha

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > a few important points: Supporting SSH transport would be a good idea too. Kris PGP signature

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yep, you are right. cvs writes the shadow stuff in /tmp. bleah. It does honor $TMPDIR and the "-T" option, though. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-Sep-01 John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: >> > - You need an MFS filesystem with zillions of inodes, because >> > anonymous CVS just hammers the disk with tiny l

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:41:13AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > > - You need an MFS filesystem with zillions of inodes, because > > > anonymous CVS ju

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > - You need an MFS filesystem with zillions of inodes, because > > anonymous CVS just hammers the disk with tiny lock files or state > > files. If they

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David O'Brien > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is the right mailing list to plead for more anoncvs mirrors? > > I doubt that "pleading" would help, but "volunteering" might. :-) For occational

Re: more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the right mailing list to plead for more anoncvs mirrors? I doubt that "pleading" would help, but "volunteering" might. :-) I have (had?) been maintaining anoncvs.freebsd.org, but I don't have time for any others

more anoncvs servers Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:38:06AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > KSrinivasa Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For some reasons I was unable to checkout sources from cvs server of > > FreeBSD sources. I have been using anoncvs.FreeBSD.org to fetch the > >

Re: none

2001-09-05 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, KSrinivasa Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For some reasons I was unable to checkout sources from cvs server of > FreeBSD sources. I have been using anoncvs.FreeBSD.org to fetch the > files. I believe the administrators have been upgrading that system. I

Re: none

2000-08-21 Thread Nickolay Dudorov
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Not sure if this is related to the recent commit of DEVFS code, but a > build of both the GERNERIC kernel and a custom kernel from a very recent > (last few hours) cvsup of -current failed during the 'make depend' with > an error trying to include "opt_