Re: lockmgr panics (fwd)

1999-06-27 Thread Nick Hibma
> Did you really get that message? if the unlocking process is > pid -2(LK_KERNPROC), we can unlock, as in: > lockmgr: pid -2, not exclusive lock holder 48 unlocking This looks like it, yes. Must have made a typo. Nick -- e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: lockmgr panics

1999-06-27 Thread Peter Wemm
Seigo Tanimura wrote: > From: Nick Hibma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: lockmgr panics > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:15:06 +0200 (CEST) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > hibma> lockmgr: pid , not exclusive lock holder -2 unlocking > > > Did you really get that message? if the unlocking proces

Re: lockmgr panics

1999-06-27 Thread Seigo Tanimura
From: Nick Hibma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lockmgr panics Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:15:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hibma> lockmgr: pid , not exclusive lock holder -2 unlocking Did you really get that message? if the unlocking process is pid -2(LK_KERNPROC), we can unlock,