> I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
> required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about
> nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What
> libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this
> just paranoia inspire
At 11:43 PM -0700 11/23/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: The one case (so far) where this seemed to make a difference
: was libposix1e. It was disconnected from the build by revision
: 1.119 of src/lib/Makefile b
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 2002-11-23 21:13, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
: > required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit abo
On 2002-11-23 21:13, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
> required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about
> nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What
> libraries are bad that need
I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about
nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What
libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this
just paranoia inspired?
Warner
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 06:03:17AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> I tried to get myself a clean /usr/{include,lib} installation after a
> successful buildworld earlier. To make this as clean an installation
> as possible, I did the following before running "make installworld":
>
> # cd /
On 2002-11-23 10:36, Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apparently editors/vim-lite had picked up an old, obsolete libposix*.so
> > from one of the past installations and linked against that. Deleting
> > the port and reinstalling it worked like a charm, which made me think
> > a bit... S
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:36:16AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Apparently editors/vim-lite had picked up an old, obsolete libposix*.so
> > from one of the past installations and linked against that. Deleting
> > the port and reinstalling it worked like a charm, which made me think
> > a bit...
> Apparently editors/vim-lite had picked up an old, obsolete libposix*.so
> from one of the past installations and linked against that. Deleting
> the port and reinstalling it worked like a charm, which made me think
> a bit... Should we recommend in UPDATING that source upgrades include
> someth
