On 17 Jun, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> The FILE_LOCK() implementation uses "pool mutex" under the hood, which
>> means it should only be used as a leaf level mutex. The fdrop_locked()
>> code wants to be called with FILE_LOCK() held, but the fdrop_locked(
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> The FILE_LOCK() implementation uses "pool mutex" under the hood, which
> means it should only be used as a leaf level mutex. The fdrop_locked()
> code wants to be called with FILE_LOCK() held, but the fdrop_locked()
> implementation calls mtx_lock(&Giant
