Re: clang (__builtin_ffs) vs /usr/include/string.h

2011-12-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/12/2011 11:31 Larry Rosenman said the following: > Lsof.. > And this seems like a contradiction between the string.h declaration and the > built-in one. It more looks like you include machine/cpufunc.h before strings.h and that has an undesired side effect. -- Andriy Gapon ___

Re: clang (__builtin_ffs) vs /usr/include/string.h

2011-12-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
Lsof.. And this seems like a contradiction between the string.h declaration and the built-in one. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Hi Larry, On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Larry Rosenman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: clang (__builtin_ffs) vs /usr/include/string.h

2011-12-20 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Larry, On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Larry Rosenman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is anyone going to fix the following in the clang or FreeBSD system? I haven't seen any mention of __builtin_ffs on any freebsd lists since your thread in october, "system headers with clang?"