Re: buildworld failed with -O0

2002-06-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Shizuka Kudo wrote: > Thanks for your answer. I'm just curious why a lower > optimization level could cause trouble than -O. > Anyway, my -current works fine with the default > CFLAGS. It seems that there're some commits to > rtld-elf on today. THe compiler is broken. If you are that intent on c

Re: buildworld failed with -O0

2002-06-25 Thread Shizuka Kudo
--- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I ran into, what I think is the same thing as you're > describing, a > while ago. The short and skinny being that -O0 > doesn't compile any > ASM which breaks things and is why you need at least > -O to compile the > kernel/world. ::shrug:: I

Re: buildworld failed with -O0

2002-06-23 Thread Sean Chittenden
> I don't know if I'm the one that observed this. Building world > completed with default CFLAGS (-O -pipe -march=pentiumpro), but > failed with -O0 or without optimization. /usr/src cvsupped within > one day. Here's the error message (same for -O0 and without -O). > > ===> libexec/rtld-elf > cc