Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/11/11):
> And almost at the same time, I'm looking at the last change to
> boot0.s 1.26, if there is forgotten TBL1SZ update, or not :o)))
Just for record: I have submitted patch solving problems with
bad information about partitions as kern/59256 right now.
--
Rudolf Ce
Dag-ErlingSm?rgrav wrote (2003/11/11):
> - boot0 off-by-one error:
>The OS table in boot0.s is as follows:
> .byte os_misc-. # Unknown
> ...
> .byte os_bsd-. # NetBSD
>Now, boot0 identifies my FreeBSD partitions as "BSD" inst
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:
> I've been busy installing various OSes on a spare disk in order to try
> to reproduce some of fefe's benchmarks. In the process, I've noticed
> a couple of bogons in boot0 and disklabel:
>
> - disklabel -B trashes the partition table
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you have a second disk in the system? Are you able to switch to the
> second disk with boot0? I have a current system where I'm not able to
> switch to the second disk (master on secondary ata channel).
Yes, I can switch back and forth between t
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:36:14 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote:
> - boot0 off-by-one error:
>Now, boot0 identifies my FreeBSD partitions as "BSD" instead of
>"FreeBSD". It also identifies my Debian partition (type 0x83) as
>"BSD" instead of "Linux" and my Debian sw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
>This probably happens because fdisk silently allows the user to
>create a partition that overlaps the partition table. Arguably
>pilot error, but very confusing at the time, and fdisk should warn
>about it.
...and here's the patch.
