on 12/09/2011 15:26 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> I think the patch is
>>> fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like
>>> removing
>>> nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2
On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > I think the patch is
> > fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like
> > removing
> > nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well.
>
> I personally agree, thank you for this su
on 12/09/2011 14:43 John Baldwin said the following:
> I suspect some of the recent changes to shave space down for Clang have made
> some of the optimization options no longer necessary.
Just a note of all the options in question were added long before clang.
> I think the patch is
> fine, and
On Monday, September 12, 2011 3:36:54 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> This email is in part inspired by the following problem:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/135292
> So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line.
>
> So here is my proposal.
>
> Part I. ZFS and GPT bootbl
on 12/09/2011 10:36 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> This email is in part inspired by the following problem:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/135292
> So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line.
>
> So here is my proposal.
I would like to clarify that my intenti
