Re: __thread support in -current..

2003-06-17 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > I guess the support is in gcc as Linux and solaris use it, but > is our linker close enough to what they use to be able to benefit at all > from them? We'll need an updated GCC at the very least; I see some stuff in binutils regarding TLS. I think we'

Re: __thread support in -current..

2003-06-17 Thread Julian Elischer
see my answer to you there.. On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Ok, so having thrashed out what is required on the threads list > > (and severely strained (but hopefully not permanently) our relations > > wit

Re: __thread support in -current..

2003-06-17 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Ok, so having thrashed out what is required on the threads list > (and severely strained (but hopefully not permanently) our relations > with the OpenGL folks) we've figured out that we do need to support > __thread (if we don'

Re: __thread support in -current..

2003-06-17 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess the support is in gcc as Linux and solaris use it, but > is our linker close enough to what they use to be able to benefit at > all from them? > The __thread support is available in GCC 3.3+ only. The