Nick Hibma writes:
> Yes, the driver is here and it seems to work according to Mike Meyer
> (IIRC), he's fixed up a few other bits and pieces and I am ready to
> commit it, but I haven't had time to test it yet.
I've still got the problems I reported to the bsd-usb list, but I
suspect those are s
> : > usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
> :
> : They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
> : addressed the last problem I understood he had.
>
> I'll have to ask him about it then.
Picked it up, looked at it, got distracted by Reality and mu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > : Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
: >
: > usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
:
: They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back tha
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
> : Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
>
> usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
addressed the last problem I understood he had.
> How can
> : Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
Not WinModems as such (the USB link is too slow to feed the DSP, but
they do have proprietary protocols).
3COM modems are safe though. They are class compliant.
Nick
>
> usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know. How can you
> te
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know. How can you
tell the usb modems that are win modems? And can y ou get docs on
them?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eaglez writes:
: Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
: mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
: the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
: because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
: windows drivers available). I'd advise po
On 05-Jun-00 John Hengstler wrote:
> I don't know that what the actual modem is inside. The system is a Compaq
> Presario 1200.
I rather think that means Lucent windows only modem. It does in my 1690.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
At 2 Jun 2000 21:09:16 GMT,
John Hengstler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pci0: (vendor=0x11c1, dev=0x0441) at 9.0 irq 9
http://www.yourvote.com/pci/pciread.asp?venid=0x11c1 says that chip is
AT&T Microelectronics' WinModem. This is not yet supported by
FreeBSD.
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECT
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eaglez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Hengstler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Unknown Devices
> > Well, i'm not sure about 5.0
> Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
> mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
> the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
> because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
> windows drivers available). I'd advise possibly an
> external modem. (Hey, they're prob
Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
windows drivers available). I'd advise possibly an
external modem. (Hey, they're probably still c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
: and have devices listed as 'unknown' in dmesg. Everything appears to
: function OK.
They are ok.
: The serial ports, sio0 and sio1 appear both as sio and unknown.
Yes. This is expected. The PnP BIOS code which should execute before
al
13 matches
Mail list logo
