Re: The great perl script rewrite - big problem

2002-12-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-12-08 16:03, Riccardo Torrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I contributed to the great perl script rewrite but seems that > we forgot to rewrite some important perl script: > > # grep -lR perl /etc/periodic/ > /etc/periodic/daily/440.status-mailq > /etc/periodic/daily/460.status-mail-rejects

Re: The great perl script rewrite - big problem

2002-12-08 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 08-Dec-2002 (17:54:49/GMT) Mark Murray wrote: > The Perl rewrite does not affect 4.x, only 5.x. Yes, I know, but I think would be usefull remove it also from 4.x, at least for small job (perl script inline, as in periodic). >> Because FreeBSD.org use postfix I think it already resolved this

Re: The great perl script rewrite - big problem

2002-12-08 Thread Mark Murray
Hi The Perl rewrite does not affect 4.x, only 5.x. M > I contributed to the great perl script rewrite but seems that > we forgot to rewrite some important perl script: > > # grep -lR perl /etc/periodic/ > /etc/periodic/daily/440.status-mailq > /etc/periodic/daily/460.status-mail-rejects > /etc/

Re: The great perl script rewrite - big problem

2002-12-08 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 08-Dec-2002 (17:07:02/GMT) Christian Brueffer wrote: > this has already been taken care of: > keramida2002/12/07 15:37:45 PST > Log: > Avoid using perl in the periodic & security scripts. This brings > the base system one step closer to being totally perl-free. And me one step back

Re: The great perl script rewrite - big problem

2002-12-08 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:03:48PM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote: > I contributed to the great perl script rewrite but seems that > we forgot to rewrite some important perl script: > > # grep -lR perl /etc/periodic/ > /etc/periodic/daily/440.status-mailq > /etc/periodic/daily/460.status-mail-rejec