On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 02:52:22PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> Unfortunately for Bob P., no suggestion can meet his full criteria. So
> he has several suggestions to potentially pick from or to use in
> combination.
>
This is a most gracious way of saying my expectations are
unreasonable. Sad
On 11/20/19 12:02 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:18:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:39 AM bob prohaska wrote:
From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
an older, well-behaved revision.
Is there a mechanism for identifying
On 2019-Nov-20, at 14:28, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/20/19 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> Bob P. wrote for an aarch64 context:
>>
>>> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
>>> an older, well-behaved revision.
>>>
>>> Is there a mechanism for identifying revisi
On 11/20/19 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
Bob P. wrote for an aarch64 context:
From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
an older, well-behaved revision.
Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
will at least compile and boot, by date?
In my case build
Bob P. wrote for an aarch64 context:
> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> an older, well-behaved revision.
>
> Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> will at least compile and boot, by date?
>
> In my case buildworld seems to be markedly sl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:18:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:39 AM bob prohaska wrote:
>
> > From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> > an older, well-behaved revision.
> >
> > Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> > wi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:39 AM bob prohaska wrote:
> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> an older, well-behaved revision.
>
> Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> will at least compile and boot, by date?
>
Almost all of them will compile.
On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 09:38 -0800, bob prohaska wrote:
> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> an older, well-behaved revision.
>
> Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> will at least compile and boot, by date?
>
> In my case buildworld seems
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:38:53AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote:
> >From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> an older, well-behaved revision.
>
> Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> will at least compile and boot, by date?
>
> In my case buildworl
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:39 AM bob prohaska wrote:
>
> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
> an older, well-behaved revision.
>
> Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
> will at least compile and boot, by date?
>
> In my case buildworld seems to b
10 matches
Mail list logo
