On 11/4/2017 9:35 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 11/3/2017 9:35 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /root/git/freebsd/release/.. and install
>>> files to
>>> the temproot environment
>>>
>>>
On 11/3/2017 9:35 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /root/git/freebsd/release/.. and install
>> files to
>> the temproot environment
>>
>>
>
> If you run into an issue like that with t
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:41:20 + (UTC)
Kostya Berger wrote:
> Could somebody, please, explain this:
> Am I right to assume that CURRENT or "head" release number is now
> 12.0?For in that case I'll have to reduild the ports in case of
> upgrading my system to the current head, right?Because my cu
Hi!
> Could somebody, please, explain this:
> Am I right to assume that CURRENT or "head" release number is now
> 12.0?
Yes.
> For in that case I'll have to reduild the ports in case of
> upgrading my system to the current head, right? Because my current
> system was build well before the 11.0-a
toha> Release build fails:
toha> drivers.flp: file system if full.
Since yesterday.
toha> Can somebody remove some driver from drivers.conf?
No, don't do that. Since we have only 3 floppies, simply removing
some modules may mean "it cannot use it while installing FreeBSD."
Fortunately w
Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:57:58 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. 3.6.1 has the same bug, and 3.7 isn't out yet.
> http://www.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-announce/2003-September/64.html
We use OpenSSH-portable, whi
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:57:58 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> look pretty on your screen?
A
David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> > to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> > look pretty on your screen?
> Umm,
"Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> > to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> > look pretty on your screen?
> Apparently, yes.
No. 3.6.1 has the same bug, and 3.7 isn't out yet.
DES
--
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:47:44PM -0400, David Rhodus wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> >Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update
> >to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers
> >look pretty on yo
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
real. Ops, now thats right, we don't have 3.6.1 in STABLE, why ? It
was released on April 1, does that not give one enough t
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:30:50AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Patches have been floated on the mailing list that revert PAE in its
> >>various stages. Maybe those need to be brought back up. Silby? Tor?
> >>
> >>Scott
>
Scott Long wrote:
> Agreed. PAE was merged into -stable in three steps. Backing out the
> third step and leaving the first two steps removes the instability.
> Unfortunately, it was the third step that also was the most complex.
> In any case, we have 2 weeks to find the resolution before the dec
ovalov; Scott Long; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Release Engineering Status Report
> >
> >
> > David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
> > > real. Ops, now thats
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
Patches have been floated on the mailing list that revert PAE in its
various stages. Maybe those need to be brought back up. Silby? Tor?
Scott
I believe that Tor's commit on August 30th resolved the PAE-related
problems, so there
> 3. A panic caused by sending 64K-1 ping packets, which I can't reproduce.
Is this a firewall induced panic? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> Patches have been floated on the mailing list that revert PAE in its
> various stages. Maybe those need to be brought back up. Silby? Tor?
>
> Scott
I believe that Tor's commit on August 30th resolved the PAE-related
problems, so there is no need for a
c: Maxim Konovalov; Scott Long; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release Engineering Status Report
>
>
> David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
> > real. Ops, now thats right, we don'
Bill Moran wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG_4_x sec
Scott Long wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG_4_x security
branches beca
David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
> real. Ops, now thats right, we don't have 3.6.1 in STABLE, why ? It
> was released on April 1, does that not give one enough time to merge
> this in ?
Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
:Bruce Evans wrote:
:> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
:>
:>
:>>PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
:>>affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
:>>SAs since PAE commit. They often can't swit
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG_4_x security
branches because even RELENG_4_
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:43:00AM -0400, David Rhodus wrote:
> Right, say if still the OpenSSH did or still comes out to be
> real. Ops, now thats right, we don't have 3.6.1 in STABLE, why ? It
> was released on April 1, does that not give one enough time to merge
> this in ?
Merging new versions
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 06:11 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> PAE MFC brought an incredible instability to stable branch. It
> affects 100% of our user community especially when we issued several
> SAs since PAE commit. They often can't switch to RELENG_4_x security
> branches because even RELENG_4_8 misses sev
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, 23:48-0600, Scott Long wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to give a status report for 4.x and 5.x for the developers and
> users who didn't attend the DevSummit this past weekend.
>
> 4.9:
> The 4.9 release is likely going to be pushed back for a few weeks while
> the recent instabili
Subject: Release seems to be broken or maybe I missed a change.,
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:34:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With cvsup early this morning. Make release generated
Which version of src/libexec/rtld-elf/Makefile are you using ?
This problem was fixed a few days ago.
> install -o
> + Anton Yudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> | How to fix problem with floppies > 1457664 bytes?
>
> By not downloading a new release before it's announced. Just wait, a
> corrected version of 4.8-RELEASE without this problem will appear.
> Wait a little longer, for the official announcement. The
+ Anton Yudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| How to fix problem with floppies > 1457664 bytes?
By not downloading a new release before it's announced. Just wait, a
corrected version of 4.8-RELEASE without this problem will appear.
Wait a little longer, for the official announcement. Then get it.
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 19:05:08 +0200, John Hay wrote:
>>
>> when bulding release on -current I get (since a couple of days):
>>
> >> rm -rf /R/stage/dists
> >> mkdir -p /R/stage/dists
> >> rolling base/base tarball
> >> mtree: line 0: dumpdates: No such file or directory
> >> *** Error code 1
jhay> md5 died on zero length files. You will have to upgrade the machine or
jhay> at least do a buildworld with new source before you try a release again.
Ya, that's exactly the problem on my buildbox... Thank you for the info.
But if new md5(1) doesn't used by during a release, it's yet anot
>
> when bulding release on -current I get (since a couple of days):
>
> > rm -rf /R/stage/dists
> > mkdir -p /R/stage/dists
> > rolling base/base tarball
> > mtree: line 0: dumpdates: No such file or directory
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /usr/src/release.
>
> Somehow dumpdates didn't
Howdy,
Disconnecting usr/share/doc/usd/13.viref and usr/share/doc/papers/sysperf
from the build process allowed me to build a -current snapshot.
I found the reference in the CVS logs (2002/05/15 09:29:45 PDT) that c++
isn't being built. This explains the lack of groff and tbl.
There must be some
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assar, can you review and commit this?
This is ok, but jhb has already fixed this.
/assar
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 23-Feb-01 John Hay wrote:
>> ===> lib/libgssapi
>> rm -f .depend
>> mkdep -f .depend -a
> ...
>> /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/krb5.h:43:
>> krb5_err.h: No such file or directory
>> /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/krb5.h:
It looks like I was wrong. This patch fix a "make release" for me. The
other problems must have been fixed with the other krb fixes over the
past few days.
Any reason not to commit it?
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ===> lib/libgssapi
> > rm -f .depend
> > mkdep -f .depend -a
> .
Assar, can you review and commit this?
At 23 Feb 2001 04:31:06 GMT,
John Hay wrote:
> Index: kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -
> ===> lib/libgssapi
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a
...
> /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/krb5.h:43:
> krb5_err.h: No such file or directory
> /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/krb5.h:44:
> heim_err.h: No such file or dire
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Forrest Aldrich writes:
: Just curious on the potential release of 5.0 -- which I presume won't be
: until next year.. ?
2001 sometime, likely not early in the year. At least that's my WAG
at the moment.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
>
> On 29-Jun-00 Mark Murray wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I just committed a fix for this.
>
> Thank you!!
Please give me feedback on this when releases work again for you...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
On 29-Jun-00 Mark Murray wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just committed a fix for this.
Thank you!!
> M
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscr
Hi
I just committed a fix for this.
M
> Mark,
>
> A test release I built today died while installing Perl the second
> time around into the trees directory where the install distributions
> are rolled from as follows:
>
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/re
> cd /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl
On 28-Jun-00 Mark Murray wrote:
>> ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/B
>> make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop
>
> OK - I know how to fix this.
>
> Thanks for the report!
Thanks. :)
> M
> --
> Mark Murray
> Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROT
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/B
> make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop
OK - I know how to fix this.
Thanks for the report!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bod
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:55:59PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > A test release I built today died while installing Perl the second
> > time around into the trees directory where the install distributions
> > are rolled from as follows:
>
> I just successfully upgraded from a ap
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:55:59PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> Mark,
>
> A test release I built today died while installing Perl the second
> time around into the trees directory where the install distributions
> are rolled from as follows:
I just successfully upgraded from a approx 3-4 week ol
Yes 2.x went on for too long but I was counting 2.2.x as the equivalent of
3.x due to the change in the release schedule (mainly just a change in the
numberring).
The thing that worries me is the bad reputation that comes from releasing
not quite ready releases.
Basically the real way to run Fre
On 13-Dec-99 Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Consider the 2.2 stream that went through many more releases (counting
> 2.2.1 -> 2.2.8). Using that yardstick you'd expect 4.0 to stay in
> development until 3.7 is released. I know 7 releases of the 2.2 stream
> was considerred a few too many but surely we
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> Tell a computer to WIN and ...
>... You lose
Actually, I always thought there was something subliminal about typing
"WIN". Funny how they didn't choose "WIND". It's like, you're typing
"WIN", so you in
On 13-Dec-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:34:28 +1030, Matthew Thyer wrote:
>
>> What is the big rush to 4.0-RELEASE ?
>
> We are relying on public awareness of the fact that .0 releases (in just
> about any project) are _going_ to have issues. We need the 4 branch out
>
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:34:28 +1030, Matthew Thyer wrote:
> What is the big rush to 4.0-RELEASE ?
We are relying on public awareness of the fact that .0 releases (in just
about any project) are _going_ to have issues. We need the 4 branch out
out there in the hands of the masses.
Ciao,
Sheldo
Months. :)
> Any idea of when 4.0-RELEASE will be out, in terms of months or years?
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
In message <02d801bf3132$71f6f8c0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David W. Chapman Jr.
" writes:
>Any idea of when 4.0-RELEASE will be out, in terms of months or years?
Feature freeze in this year. Release in Q1/2000.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Forrest Aldrich writes:
>We're building a few new systems. I wondered what the status
>was of the 4.0 project (stability and release date estimate).
We expect release Q1/2000 some time.
Feature freeze will probably happen this year.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
55 matches
Mail list logo
