On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:33 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> Thank you for dmesg. It looks you are right that your device in PIO
> mode doesn't work. Specially RX path is weird that it was good until
> the status is changed to RUN but after querying DHCP requests (or
> another) there were no more RX
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:05:43AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Mar
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong w
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> When it occurs again, I will get you the details an
On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do
you want a verbose dmesg, or a standard one?
>>>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do
> > > you want a verbose dmesg, or a standard one?
> >
> > I think a standard one is enough.
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do
> > you want a verbose dmesg, or a standard one?
>
> I think a standard one is enough. Thank you.
Here you go. This is on -CURRENT from about 30 minutes ago. Tha
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:46:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 3/3/10 5:04 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus
On 3/3/10 5:04 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the
> > > flaky NDIS version.
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the
> > flaky NDIS version. I have a Dell Vostra 2510 with a LP bwn mini-PCI
> > card. I have set if_b
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the
> flaky NDIS version. I have a Dell Vostra 2510 with a LP bwn mini-PCI
> card. I have set if_bwn_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf. I also have
> bwn_v4_lp_uco
12 matches
Mail list logo
