Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-06-04 Thread 梅本 肇
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2000 12:30:42 -0500 (EST) > "Andrew J. Korty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > > BTW, I believe this version of pam_ssh.so doesn't support DSA key yet. > > Does someone working on it? ajk> Oops ... it looks like ssh-agent doesn't

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-06-04 Thread Andrew J. Korty
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > > BTW, I believe this version of pam_ssh.so doesn't support DSA key yet. > > Does someone working on it? Oops ... it looks like ssh-agent doesn't support DSA keys yet. Am I missing something? I suppose I could just add DSA support for the PAM aut

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-06-04 Thread Andrew J. Korty
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > > Thank you. It's working fine with wdm here. > > Good to know. > > > BTW, I believe this version of pam_ssh.so doesn't support DSA key yet. > > Does someone working on it? > > Perhaps the author could tell us (CCed) :-) I'm on it. -- Andrew

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-06-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Thank you. It's working fine with wdm here. Good to know. > BTW, I believe this version of pam_ssh.so doesn't support DSA key yet. > Does someone working on it? Perhaps the author could tell us (CCed) :-) Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-06-01 Thread 梅本 肇
> On Tue, 30 May 2000 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kris> On Tue, 30 May 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > I've just committed the version from ports to the source tree - could you > > verify it works? > > I have to wait until internat catches up, but

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-05-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > I've just committed the version from ports to the source tree - could you > > verify it works? > > I have to wait until internat catches up, but I'm using pam_ssh.c from > ports for a while and it didn't kill xdm. Oops, this is now committed t

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-05-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 30 May, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> I also met this with wdm here. >> To avoid this problem, I replaced pam_ssh.c with >> ports/security/opessh/pam_ssh.c with changing PATH_SSH_AGENT to >> /usr/bin/ssh-agent. It seems working. > > I've just committed the version from ports to the source tree - c

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-05-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > I also met this with wdm here. > To avoid this problem, I replaced pam_ssh.c with > ports/security/opessh/pam_ssh.c with changing PATH_SSH_AGENT to > /usr/bin/ssh-agent. It seems working. I've just committed the version from ports to the source tree

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-05-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 21 May, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: [kris CCed, I think hi knows how to handle this] > Alexander> after a new build{world,kernel} after the import of OpenSSH 2.1 to > Alexander> internat (cvsupped 2517, around 14:00 CEST), xdm gets a signal > Alexander> 11 if I use pam_ssh.so (after entering th

Re: PAM & OpenSSH 2.1 & X11 -> signal 11

2000-05-20 Thread 梅本 肇
> On Thu, 18 May 2000 16:19:25 +0200 (CEST) > Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Alexander> after a new build{world,kernel} after the import of OpenSSH 2.1 to Alexander> internat (cvsupped 2517, around 14:00 CEST), xdm gets a signal Alexander> 11 if I use pam_ssh.so (after