Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-09 Thread David Malone
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > Did you try the "use_uid" option? Looks like you're dead right! I can't test it 'till tomorrow, but I'm sure it works. Oh, if only everything came with man pages, then I could RTFM. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 11:08 PM 1/8/00 +, David Malone wrote: >On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >> At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> >Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write >> >one? >> >> No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Atti

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread David Malone
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > >Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write > >one? > > No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic. If it came from the linux version of pam, then p

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: >Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write >one? No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic. Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > can go away. WHEELSU can (and should) be provided by > pam_wheel. wollman@khavrinen(2996)$ ls /usr/lib/pam_*.so /usr/lib/pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so /usr/lib/pam_radius.so /usr/lib/pam_deny.so/usr/lib/pam_skey.so /usr/lib/pam_kerberosIV.so /usr/lib/

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 02:32 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett wrote: >< said: > >> I've noticed that su(1) is not yet PAM'ized. Is anybody >> working on this? If so, I'm willing to test. If not >> and time permits, I'll see if I can whip up an appropriate >> patch. > >If you do this, please take care not to break WHEELSU