On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> Did you try the "use_uid" option?
Looks like you're dead right! I can't test it 'till tomorrow, but I'm
sure it works.
Oh, if only everything came with man pages, then I could RTFM.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
At 11:08 PM 1/8/00 +, David Malone wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>> At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> >Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
>> >one?
>>
>> No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Atti
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> >Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
> >one?
>
> No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic.
If it came from the linux version of pam, then p
At 04:43 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>Hmmm. I don't see any such module. Or are you proposing to write
>one?
No. I'd just pull the pam_wheel from the Attic.
Kurt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
< said:
> can go away. WHEELSU can (and should) be provided by
> pam_wheel.
wollman@khavrinen(2996)$ ls /usr/lib/pam_*.so
/usr/lib/pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so /usr/lib/pam_radius.so
/usr/lib/pam_deny.so/usr/lib/pam_skey.so
/usr/lib/pam_kerberosIV.so /usr/lib/
At 02:32 PM 1/8/00 -0500, Garrett wrote:
>< said:
>
>> I've noticed that su(1) is not yet PAM'ized. Is anybody
>> working on this? If so, I'm willing to test. If not
>> and time permits, I'll see if I can whip up an appropriate
>> patch.
>
>If you do this, please take care not to break WHEELSU