On 07-Aug-01 Paul Saab wrote:
> Kenneth D. Merry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> diff2 output, on the other hand, won't run through patch properly. You
>> have to run it through a fixup script to get it right.
>
> p4 diff -u -b branch
p4 diff2 -u -b branch
^
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PRO
Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I have pushed the thread pointers down through most of the code
> > though there are still many many places that assume that there is only one
> > thread per process. (no multithreading yet, but getting closer..)
>
> Keep u
Kenneth D. Merry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> diff2 output, on the other hand, won't run through patch properly. You
> have to run it through a fixup script to get it right.
p4 diff -u -b branch
That works just fine.
--
Paul Saab
Technical Yahoo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 21:39:11 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2001 05:07:13 +0200, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > At this stage diffs must be pushing close to 1MB (maybe more)
> > > (I don't know as I don't know yet how to get p4 to generate diffs :-)
> >
> > Isn't it jus
On 7 Aug 2001 05:07:13 +0200, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At this stage diffs must be pushing close to 1MB (maybe more)
> > (I don't know as I don't know yet how to get p4 to generate diffs :-)
>
> Isn't it just `p4 diff` ?
The diff produced by the above command is not accepted
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have pushed the thread pointers down through most of the code
> though there are still many many places that assume that there is only one
> thread per process. (no multithreading yet, but getting closer..)
Keep up the good progress :-)
> At this st
