Doug White wrote:
Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have
this exact disk in my sparc64 here and the first time I used it, it kept
running over bad sectors and generally causing mayhem. Running the full
scan with the tool, it prompted to fix some problems, then th
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> causing this bizarre behavior ? If this is of any help, the exact model
> number of the HD is "MAXTOR 4K040H2" and I was using UFS2 on both
> drives. Thanks in advance.
Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have
this exact dis
Dan Naumov wrote:
What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. [...] After the installation of the OS (usually
about 8-12 days of running non-stop) I start getting "Bad File
Descriptor" errors on random files all around the Maxtor drive and I
have
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote
>
> >You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2,
> >which has a new ATA driver?
> >
> >Kris
> >
> >
> I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to
> update ports. A fi
Kris Kennaway wrote
You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2,
which has a new ATA driver?
Kris
I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to
update ports. A file that has a "Bad File Descriptor" refuses to let
cvsup overwrite and/or remove itsel
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello
>
> What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
> FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am
> considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent
> this issue
On 20-Jan-02 Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
>
>> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
>> series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
>> up)?
>>
>> Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Jason Andresen wrote:
> > Odd, I can't reproduce that under RedHat:
>
> I guess you are saying there is a conspiracy to make GCC work
> only on RedHat?
>
> I could believe that... 8-) 8-) 8-).
>
> Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
>
> If that's been fixed, I gues
On 23 Jan, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> [gcc 3.0.x bug]
>> > Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
>> >
>> > If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the
>> > non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms
>> > works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?).
>
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> [gcc 3.0.x bug]
> > Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
> >
> > If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the
> > non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms
> > works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?).
>
> gcc 3.0.
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Alp Atici wrote:
> > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> > FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> > compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
>
> I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
> no longer core dumps on:
Odd, I ca
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the last episode (Jan 19), Terry Lambert said:
> > Alp Atici wrote:
> > > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> > > series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0
> > > (or up)?
> >
> > I think that th
In the last episode (Jan 19), Terry Lambert said:
> Alp Atici wrote:
> > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> > series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0
> > (or up)?
>
> I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
> no longer
Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
no longer core dumps on:
main()
{
int i;
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
> up)?
>
> Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Can't answer the gcc question, but yes, John
[-hackers removed from CC. One list is enough.]
Alp Atici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
Yes. Not yet.
> Is 5.x series going to be based on a pree
16 matches
Mail list logo
