On 11/17/14, 6:55 AM, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:55:16 -0800 Rui Paulo wrote
On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
suggest new tasks. Again i am
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:55:16 -0800 Rui Paulo wrote
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> > for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> > suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the projects
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
>>> for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever w
On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the projects
> suggested there are not important, just belong somewhere e
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mark Saad wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >>> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequ
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> > for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> > suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the pr
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> BTW, FYI:
>
> We didn't make it this year.
>
> Judging by the GSoC 2014 Reunion, there is a l
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
> > Hello,
BTW, FYI:
We didn't make it this year.
Judging by the GSoC 2014 Reunion, there is a lot of seasoned Orgs which
treat GCIN very seriously, so I think if we plan
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This year we'd like to participate in the Google Code-In 2014. This is
> > Google Summer of Code, but for younger people: age range is 13--17. If
> > you'r
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This year we'd like to participate in the Google Code-In 2014. This is
> Google Summer of Code, but for younger people: age range is 13--17. If
> you're one of them, we highly encourage you to apply!
>
> ***This year coding tas
Hi!
> 2 ideas:
>
> 1. port DFBSD's CAM DA driver
[...]
Maybe I'm showing my age here, but Code-In is for school kids
aged 13-17, and in my time, there were very few kids at that task level 8-}
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
_
Hello, List,
2 ideas:
1. port DFBSD's CAM DA driver
It's doing much better than FB in heavy load with random IO, eg. squid
or postgres databases for zabbix 1.8.
It's released within DFBSD V2.10
"CAM DA driver enhanced to separate read and write streams, allowing
concurrent write completion
12 matches
Mail list logo
