On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:05:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Hmm, I'm not sure this is the same bug I was seeing, because mine went
> > away when I turned off malloc debugging.
>
> Without malloc debugging the chance that the allocated memory has
> zeroes is large(r). Going past the term
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:59:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >
> > > > malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
> > > > rman coredu
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:52:28AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >
> > > > malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
> > > > rman coredu
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
> > > malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
> > > rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
> > >
> > > Coincide
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:43:37AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:16:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
> > > malloc, you say? I have build failures in XFree4-clients because
> > > rman coredumps and I have a backtrace full of free() frames...
> > >
> > > Coincide
