On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 11:05:49PM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
> >
> > [awk diff]
>
> I remember a long time ago someone asked me to make some modifications
> to softcore.awk to com
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
> : OTOH, if we are still perl-safe, I could send you the newer perl
> : script, so you can adapt from that.
>
> FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
Yeah, but one must have world installed to build
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> > Anyway, all good to know. There are almost certainly more perl
> > speakers than awk speakers these days, so it probably makes sense
> > to do these things in perl rather than awk.
>
> I think that's sort of in the grey area. There are al
> Anyway, all good to know. There are almost certainly more perl
> speakers than awk speakers these days, so it probably makes sense
> to do these things in perl rather than awk.
I think that's sort of in the grey area. There are also many Hardened
Traditionalists(tm) like myself who don't know
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 09:22:36PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 04:17:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
>
> > Is that desirable? Or do we need more awk?
>
> Um, yes. The reason we have Perl in the b
< said:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 04:17:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
> Is that desirable? Or do we need more awk?
Um, yes. The reason we have Perl in the base system is so that
programs like this can be written -- in a way that (a) does
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 04:17:50PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
> : OTOH, if we are still perl-safe, I could send you the newer perl
> : script, so you can adapt from that.
>
> FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
Is that d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Abley writes:
: > FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
:
: Is that desirable? Or do we need more awk?
It simply is.
It would be very hard, imho, to replace doug's perl scripts with awk
ones. However, my knowledge of perl >> awk, so there maybe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
: OTOH, if we are still perl-safe, I could send you the newer perl
: script, so you can adapt from that.
FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
>
> diff -u -d -r1.2 softcore.awk
> --- softcore.awk1999/01/22 23:52:57 1.2
> +++ softcore.awk1999/09/29 09:47:30
> @@ -91,6 +91,6 @@
>printf "\"quit \";\n";
>printf "\n\nvoid ficlC
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> I don't believe I ever got around to doing it at the time, but I'd
> be more than happy to implement the changes now if (a) someone could
> remind me what the compression logic should be, and (b) someone could
> confirm that these changes haven't already been made :)
AFAIK,
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
>
> [awk diff]
I remember a long time ago someone asked me to make some modifications
to softcore.awk to compress the textual ficl keywords by eliminating
double-spaces and newlines
12 matches
Mail list logo
