On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Has anyone answered the original question? Are there going to be
> packages for libreoffice? If not, why not?
>
> Doug
Yes as soon as pointyhat builds are uploaded.
For example there are libreoffice packages on http://pkgbeta.freebsd
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:53:15AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >
> > Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++
> > as libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled,
> > while it is unbundled with cl
Has anyone answered the original question? Are there going to be
packages for libreoffice? If not, why not?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
Baptiste Daroussin writes:
> >With clang, I get:
> >
> > =
> > (1/1) Building module icc
> > =
> > Entering
> /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/icc
> >
> > Using system SampleICC, nothing to do here.
> > Entering
>
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:00:12AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Daniel Nebdal writes:
>
> > >> Making: libuno_sal.so.3
> > >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
> > ../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found
> > >> dmake: Error code 1, while maki
Daniel Nebdal writes:
> >> Making: libuno_sal.so.3
> >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
> ../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found
> >> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3'
> >
> > That was the problem I wa
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >> Daniel Nebdal writes:
> >> > >
> >> > > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous s
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Nebdal writes:
>> > >
>> > > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
>> > > return to
>> > >
>> > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Daniel Nebdal writes:
> > >
> > > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
> > > return to
> > >
> > /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2,
> > > and run "make",
Daniel Nebdal writes:
> >
> > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
> > return to
> >
> /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2,
> > and run "make", I get:
> >
> > it says:
> >
> > Error expanding embedded variable.
>
> In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
> return to
> /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2,
> and run "make", I get:
>
> it says:
>
> Error expanding embedded variable.
>
> (Per a previous message, I have re-compil
(Late to the party - there was a pile-up on the backbone just
outside of Barcelona.)
On
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Mar 11 08:20:02 EDT 2012 amd64
I am unable to compile libreoffice-3.5. using
either Clang or gcc-4.6. The "make.conf" is appended. I have also
d
On 08/05/2012 08:53, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be
downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on
either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT?
We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at
http://wik
on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as
> libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is
> unbundled with clang.
So the "internal" cppunit was probably not needed in the environment
> I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be
> downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on
> either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT?
We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at
http://wiki.bsdforen.de/anwendungen/libreoffice_aus_i
On 05/07/12 20:22, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
>> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
>> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
>> building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build
>> ed
On 05/07/12 22:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> ...
>>> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
>>> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG).
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is
on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
>>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoff
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,
On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my
> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After
> building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build
> editors/libreoffice without problems (as far as the
2012/5/7 Baptiste Daroussin
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > >>> Well for libre
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official
On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
>>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I nev
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> > 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
> > (the 3.5) with g
on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built
> (the 3.5) with gcc from ports.
What problem are you running into?
I am able to build
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:01:19PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on eit
http://www.sendspace.com/file/02wler for 9/amd64
Regards,
Buganini
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 05/06/12 16:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
>>> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried l
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> > 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> > tried clang 3.0 and clang
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:30:40PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since LibreOffice 3.5.X can not be build on either FreeBSD
> 9-STABLE/amd64 or FreeBSD 10-CURRENT/amd64 (I tried legacy gcc 4.2.1, I
> tried clang 3.0 and clang 3.1, I tried gcc 4.6 on three different boxes,
> all failing compiling the
32 matches
Mail list logo
