On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
> > > version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
> > > handling will have improved.
> >
> > This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
> > version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
> > handling will have improved.
>
> This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes to actually work
> for file systems larger than about
From: David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY works for today's current
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:49:52 -0600
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 a
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David Syphers wrote:
> > Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
> > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
> > commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
> > d
David Syphers wrote:
> Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
> /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
> commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
> does break world for a lot of people... is there some
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:49:52PM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> fails. (Am I correct in assuming a 5.0-R install defaults to UFS2?)
You are not correct. 5.0-R, and infact 5-CURRENT still default to ufs1.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
> > I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies
> > in boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's
> > crashing all the time, and I need to ena
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
David,
> I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies in
> boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's crashing
> all the time, and I need to enable debugging stuff). Is there a fix, or would
> other inf
Thank you for your info., Giorgos.
BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY in /etc/make.conf made my buildworld OK.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:55 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Just in case anyone tries to build today's current and sees
> it fail because of boot2, you can always set BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY
> or BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY in your make.conf and rebuild.
I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and
keramida> Just in case anyone tries to build today's current and sees
keramida> it fail because of boot2, you can always set BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY
keramida> or BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY in your make.conf and rebuild.
It should work, but it can't be used for a release distribution:)
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Mat
11 matches
Mail list logo
