Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 19:27: > On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: >> >> The above looks like old-style, "canonical six" trivial ACL. Now, >> cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there >> is nothing to copy. So, for

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > > The above looks like old-style, "canonical six" trivial ACL. Now, > cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there > is nothing to copy. So, for some reason, something failed

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 15:43: > On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: >> On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: >>> Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: >> >>> [..] >> Thanks for your work on this, I'm very

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: > > On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > > > > At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an > > > md-backed filesystem; specifically, it'

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: > On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > > At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an > > md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You > > should be able to reproduce the problem by

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: >> >> Sorry, I should have been more clear -- my investigation wasn't to >> det

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Robert N. M. Watson
On 6 Mar 2011, at 16:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: 2. Are you absolutely 100% sure the kernel you're using was built with "options UFS_ACL" defined in it? Doing a "strings -a /boot/kernel/kernel | grep UFS_ACL" should suffice. >>> >>> Yep, it does: >>> >>> % strings -a /b

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an > md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You > should be able to reproduce the problem by doing a setfacl on some

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:43:34AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: > > On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: > >> Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: > > > >> [..]

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: > On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: >> Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: > >> [..] > >>> Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have ZFS v28. I just >