Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

2011-09-08 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:59:59PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: > ... > > I augment the instructions from UPDATING, prefixing the "make > > installworld" itself with: > > > > rm -fr /usr/include.old && mv /usr/include{,.old} && \ > > rm -fr /usr/share/man > > > > Thus, I have reasonable confidence

Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

2011-09-08 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/9/8 David Wolfskill : > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:12:45PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> ... >> I am particularly concerned with things like header files >> (/usr/include) that might bite me if not deleted. > > This isn't specific to that upgrade, but when I do a "make installworld", > I augm

Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

2011-09-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-09-08 02:12, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> I've been looking for any information on any special steps required to >> update from 8-stable to >> 9-current. /usr/src/UPDATING is a bit out of date as it has >> instructions for going from 5-st

Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

2011-09-08 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-09-08 02:12, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I've been looking for any information on any special steps required to > update from 8-stable to > 9-current. /usr/src/UPDATING is a bit out of date as it has > instructions for going from 5-stable > to "current", although the instruction may well be the

Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

2011-09-07 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:12:45PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > I am particularly concerned with things like header files > (/usr/include) that might bite me if not deleted. This isn't specific to that upgrade, but when I do a "make installworld", I augment the instructions from UPDATING, p