On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
>> merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
>> and therefore we ask
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi,
>
> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
> merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
> and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the revision
> we are upda
On 15-07-2010 19:42, Roman Divacky wrote:
> I updated clang/LLVM in clangbsd to a newer version which I believe
> will fix thas. can you rene (and everyone else) please retest with
> updated ClangBSD and report back?
>
The updated version builds and installs fine, I'm now running the
clangbsd kern
I updated clang/LLVM in clangbsd to a newer version which I believe
will fix thas. can you rene (and everyone else) please retest with
updated ClangBSD and report back?
thank you!
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:33:04PM +0200, Ren? Ladan wrote:
> 2010/7/14 Roman Divacky :
> > hi,
> >
> > ClangBSD was
2010/7/14 Roman Divacky :
> hi,
>
> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision r108243 which we plan to
> merge into HEAD. We would like that revision to be tested as much as possible
> and therefore we ask you to test ClangBSD to assure that the revision
> we are updating to does not have some re
