Re: "block device required"

2001-08-18 Thread David Malone
> > > msdosfs: /dev/ugen0: Block device required > > > > This is caused by the kernel returning ENOTBLK, which I think still > > makes sense in the kernel. It's possible that the errno should be > > translated to a different string though... > Just because there is no 'block' device representa

Re: "block device required"

2001-08-18 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, David Malone wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:02:04AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > Now, this may be the wrong way to do it: > > > > # mount -oro -t msdos /dev/ugen0 /mnt > > > > But the error message is certainly misleading. Especially, > > since the are no blo

Re: "block device required"

2001-08-18 Thread David Malone
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:02:04AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Now, this may be the wrong way to do it: > > # mount -oro -t msdos /dev/ugen0 /mnt > > But the error message is certainly misleading. Especially, > since the are no block devices in -current any more :) > > msdosfs:

Re: "block device required"

2001-08-18 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 18 Aug, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:02:04AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> Now, this may be the wrong way to do it: >> >> # mount -oro -t msdos /dev/ugen0 /mnt >> >> But the error message is certainly misleading. Especially, since the >> are no block devices in -c

Re: "block device required"

2001-08-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:02:04AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Now, this may be the wrong way to do it: > > # mount -oro -t msdos /dev/ugen0 /mnt > > But the error message is certainly misleading. Especially, > since the are no block devices in -current any more :) > > msdosfs: