> > The sound driver interface provides the application writer the choice to
set
> > the buffering they require. This patch has obvious implications for the
> > ordering of ioctl's that we may not want to introduce.
>
> Yes, OSS interface allows for that, but currently FreeBSD doesn't fully
> pro
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:59:53 -0700, Orion Hodson wrote:
>
> Maxim
>
> The sound driver interface provides the application writer the choice to set
> the buffering they require. This patch has obvious implications for the
> ordering of ioctl's that we may not want to introduce.
Yes, OSS inter
Maxim
The sound driver interface provides the application writer the choice to set
the buffering they require. This patch has obvious implications for the
ordering of ioctl's that we may not want to introduce.
I suspect (not insist :-) the two specific fixes you report are caused by: