On 06/10/2018 10:05, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
> … Regarding instability with CURRENT. When something changes in CURRENT that
> might affect the drm drivers there's always a delay until the drm-kmod
> packages have been rebuilt against the new source.
That's fine, thanks 👍
My frustration was le
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 7:19 AM Pete Wright wrote:
>
> On 10/5/18 6:34 PM, Graham Perrin wrote:
> > On 23/09/2018 08:09, Graham Perrin wrote:
> >
> >> Re: Suspend, resume, UEFI, CSM, drm-stable-kmod and drm-next-kmod with
> Radeon HD 7570M
> >> … better without drm-next-kmod; and (as expected, giv
On 06/10/2018 06:14, Graham Perrin wrote:
> … My sense of things earlier this morning:
>
> - without a load of radeonkms.ko it is impossible to get a (visible,
> multi-user) command line
>
> – and so, it's impossible to proceed to manually load any additional module.
A subsequent test result was
On 06/10/2018 04:16, Pete Wright wrote:
>
> On 10/5/18 6:34 PM, Graham Perrin wrote:
>> On 23/09/2018 08:09, Graham Perrin wrote:
>>
>>> Re: Suspend, resume, UEFI, CSM, drm-stable-kmod and drm-next-kmod with
>>> Radeon HD 7570M
>>> … better without drm-next-kmod; and (as expected, given the packag
On 10/5/18 6:34 PM, Graham Perrin wrote:
On 23/09/2018 08:09, Graham Perrin wrote:
Re: Suspend, resume, UEFI, CSM, drm-stable-kmod and drm-next-kmod with Radeon
HD 7570M
… better without drm-next-kmod; and (as expected, given the package message)
drm-stable-kmod has known problems with UEFI.
On 23/09/2018 08:09, Graham Perrin wrote:
> Re: Suspend, resume, UEFI, CSM, drm-stable-kmod and drm-next-kmod with Radeon
> HD 7570M
> … better without drm-next-kmod; and (as expected, given the package message)
> drm-stable-kmod has known problems with UEFI.
Now (with r339186) it seems that d
