Ok.
Thanks for the enlightenment :)
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Jan Bramkamp
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 18:55
Para: 'freebsd-current'
Assunto: Re: RES: KQueue vs Select (N
On 29.05.2014 06:57, Fred Pedrisa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are 4 threads, and a total of 32 FDs. What do you think ?
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Adrian Chadd
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio
what he said.
-a
On 28 May 2014 22:02, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2014 01:57:38 Fred Pedrisa wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There are 4 threads, and a total of 32 FDs. What do you think ?
>
> I think it is time for you to try it and find out...
>
> I suspect it wouldn't make much differenc
On Thursday 29 May 2014 01:57:38 Fred Pedrisa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are 4 threads, and a total of 32 FDs. What do you think ?
I think it is time for you to try it and find out...
I suspect it wouldn't make much difference at all if you just implement select
semantics with kqueue.
> -
Hello,
There are 4 threads, and a total of 32 FDs. What do you think ?
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Adrian Chadd
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 01:52
Para: Fred Pedrisa
Cc: freebsd-current; Ja
Hello,
Ok, but in practice, is there any performance gain by moving from select to
kQueue implementation ? Or is it not significant at all ?
-Mensagem original-
De: adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] Em nome de Adrian
Chadd
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 201
Hello,
Yes, but kqueue support was added in recent commits as it says in the netmap
changelog, is there any advantage ?
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Jan Bramkamp
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014
