RE: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex

2003-07-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Jul-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote: > One of the alpha package machines just died with the following: > > panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex > panic() at panic+0x160 > propagate_priority() at propagate_priority+0x148 > _mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x264 > _mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_f

Re: more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - withdebug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:12 PM -0800 Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:59:32PM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote: --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:47 PM -0800 Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person b

Re: more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:59:32PM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote: > > --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:47 PM -0800 Nate Lawson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person before. Tried > >memtest86.com yet? > > > > yes, LONG before I posted the first t

Re: more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - withdebug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
yes, LONG before I posted the first time. I've even swaped the memory from another system. The problem ISN'T the memory. --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:47 PM -0800 Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person before. Tried memtest86.com yet?

Re: more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debugtraceback

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
Wow, I haven't seen so many panics from one person before. Tried memtest86.com yet? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

more info - Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - withdebug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:27 PM -0500 John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 20-Nov-2002 Joel M. Baldwin wrote: --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. Another thread has decided to

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:27 PM -0500 John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 20-Nov-2002 Joel M. Baldwin wrote: --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. Another thread has decide

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Erm. Did you manage to look at dmesg then? If so, you would have seen > warnings from WITNESS earlier about the locks messing up. If you can > reproduce this and are letting it sit unattended, a better plan might be > to turn on witness_ddb (it's a ke

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Nov-2002 Joel M. Baldwin wrote: > --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: >> >>> Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb >>> mutex. Any chance this can be reproduced

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joel M. Baldwin wrote: > --On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > > > >> Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb > >> mutex. Any chance this can be

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:01 PM -0500 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb mutex. Any chance this can be reproduced while running WITNESS? If so, you should get a panic ea

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb mutex. > Any chance this can be reproduced while running WITNESS? If so, you > should get a panic earlier when the other thread sleeps in the first > place. The easiest way to do that is

Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread Robert Watson
Hmm. Another thread has decided to sleep while holding an inpcb mutex. Any chance this can be reproduced while running WITNESS? If so, you should get a panic earlier when the other thread sleeps in the first place. The easiest way to do that is if you can reproduce the panic with WITNESS. If y

RE: panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex - with debug traceback

2002-11-20 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Nov-2002 Joel M. Baldwin wrote: > > Under heavy system load and heavy swapping I had the following > panic occur. Unfortunately with this panic by the time you get to it it is too late to see what the original cause was. If you use WITNESS then WITNESS will catch the original problem and

RE: "panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex" in unmount()

2002-11-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Nov-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote: > I just got this on a Nov 1 current kernel: > > panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex > Debugger("panic") > Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 > db> bt > No such command > db> trace > Debugger(c04038ad,c047e2c0,c0402a36,d928bb80,1) at Deb