On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> OK, in retrospect, turning off swapping was a mistake. I should have
> thought about this a bit more before blindly accepting the suggestion
> from Andrzej. ;) Fixed.
Oh well.. It made sense for me, I just thought it might help to save some
space.
As Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote...
> #define quoting(Jordan K. Hubbard)
> // All: Sorry the boot.flp has been broken for this long, but I've had
> // other distractions lately. I will make it work once more, somehow
> // or other, and just keep your eyes on current.freebsd.org over
> // the next
OK, in retrospect, turning off swapping was a mistake. I should have
thought about this a bit more before blindly accepting the suggestion
from Andrzej. ;) Fixed.
- Jordan
> #define quoting(Jordan K. Hubbard)
> // All: Sorry the boot.flp has been broken for this long, but I've had
> // other di
#define quoting(Jordan K. Hubbard)
// All: Sorry the boot.flp has been broken for this long, but I've had
// other distractions lately. I will make it work once more, somehow
// or other, and just keep your eyes on current.freebsd.org over
// the next few days. When it returns to 1.44MB in size a
[snips]
> As to whether a boot.flp from an earlier SNAP will "work just the same,"
> I don't know.
>
> Cheers,
> david
> --
> David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator
> d...@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621
I used a 3.0-RELEASE boot.flp to loa
> I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99 SNAP, will
> work just the same? Thanks.
Normally, a boot.flp of about the same time will work fine. You just
need to go into the Options and change the release name string.
The 1/6/99 boot.flp is broken. /boot/* can't be found. This
I installed the 19990112 snap late last night with no problems using
the 2 disk install. Worked great. Its now been upgraded to current.
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> The boot.flp is broken..
> Try the 2 disk install (ie kern.flp and mfsroot.flp)
>
> They boot, but when I got s
On 21-Jan-99 Matt Behrens wrote:
> From 19990112? I had no such problems on three different systems.
Hmm.. OK..
Maybe pilot error :)
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them
All: Sorry the boot.flp has been broken for this long, but I've had
other distractions lately. I will make it work once more, somehow
or other, and just keep your eyes on current.freebsd.org over
the next few days. When it returns to 1.44MB in size again, give
it a try. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscri
>Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:50:58 -0800 (PST)
>From: "Richard J. Dawes"
>The "boot.flp" in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course
>won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone
>unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99
>SNAP, w
> Hello!
>
> The "boot.flp" in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course
> won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone
> unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99
> SNAP, will work just the same? Thanks.
Use the two-floppy inst
>From 19990112? I had no such problems on three different systems.
(System #3 had a lot of other unrelated problems, like a loose
ethernet cable and mislabelled jumpers on drives, but none of them
were 19990112-related.) :)
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
: On 21-Jan-99 Richard J. D
On 21-Jan-99 Richard J. Dawes wrote:
> The "boot.flp" in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course
> won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone
> unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99
> SNAP, will work just the same? Th
13 matches
Mail list logo
